Studying Clinical Reasoning, Part 2: Applying Social Judgement Theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Studying Clinical Reasoning, Part 2: Applying Social Judgement Theory
Social judgement theory offers a very different perspective to that of the information-processing approach (Doherty and Kurz 1996). It has been heralded as well suited to the study of clinical reasoning (Wigton 1996) and some of the earliest studies using this method examined clinical judgement (Hammond 1955). Social judgement theory developed from the ideas of Egon Brunswik (1903-1955), an Aus...
متن کاملUsing social judgement theory to model nurses' use of clinical information in critical care education.
Understanding the learning needs of students is a vital step in planning the delivery of effective education. Evaluating the impact of such interventions is not always easy and many methods rely on self-reported behaviour or simple changes in knowledge--whose relationship to action is not always clear. Using conjoint analysis, within the theoretical framework of social judgement theory, this st...
متن کاملOn Criteria for Formal Theory Building: Applying Logic and Automated Reasoning Tools to the Social Sciences
This paper provides practical operationalizations of criteria for evaluating scientific theories, such as the consistency and falsifiability of theories and the soundness of inferences, that take into account definitions. The precise formulation of these criteria is tailored to the use of automated theorem provers and automated model generators—generic tools from the field of automated reasonin...
متن کاملapplying social learning theory to police misconduct
Although numerous studies have attempted to understand the causes of various forms of police misconduct, there is still no clear theoretical explanation of police misbehavior. Akers’ social learning theory posits that peer associations, attitudes, reinforcement, and modeling are predictors of delinquency and crime in general. With this article, we seek to determine if the theory can account for...
متن کاملRationality Postulates: applying argumentation theory for non-monotonic reasoning
The current review paper examines how to apply Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation to define meaningful forms of non-monotonic inference. The idea is that arguments are constructed using strict and defeasible inference rules, and that it is then examined how these arguments attack (or defeat) each other. The thus defined argumentation framework provides the basis for applying Dungstyle sema...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of Occupational Therapy
سال: 2001
ISSN: 0308-0226,1477-6006
DOI: 10.1177/030802260106400604